The Complete and Practical Code Review Checklist
Introduction
A code review isn’t just about finding bugs — its main goal is continuously improving code quality.
A good code review should help you:
- Catch performance and security issues before release.
- Improve readability and maintainability.
- Keep team standards consistent.
- Prevent repeating the same mistakes.
- Share knowledge across the team.
In this post, inspired by the Neo Kim + CodeRabbit checklist and enhanced with process-oriented best practices, we’ll walk through a complete and practical approach you can apply in your projects.
🛠 Pre-Review Best Practices
Before you start reviewing someone’s code, set yourself up for success.
1. Understand the Context
- Read the PR description, linked issues, and related documentation.
- Understand why this change was made, not just what was changed.
2. Self-Review (For Authors)
- Review your own PR before asking others.
- Remove unnecessary changes, debug code, and commented-out blocks.
- Ensure tests pass locally.
3. Keep PRs Small
- Smaller PRs are easier to review thoroughly and faster to merge.
- If possible, break large features into smaller, reviewable chunks.
1️⃣ Functionality & Correctness
Ensures the code does exactly what it’s supposed to.
Checklist:
- Requirements: Does the code fulfill all feature and business requirements?
- Logic: Works for all expected inputs, including edge cases.
// Correct
if (user && user.isAdmin) { ... }
// Risky - may throw if user is null
if (user.isAdmin) { ... }
- Integration: Works without breaking existing features.
- Testing:
- All unit tests pass.
- Integration tests run successfully with real or mocked data.
- Edge Cases: Null, undefined, empty arrays, large datasets, unusual scenarios handled.
2️⃣ Readability & Clarity
Readable code is easier to maintain and less prone to bugs.
Checklist:
- Clarity: Easy to read and understand.
- Naming: Variables, functions, and classes have meaningful, descriptive names.
// Bad
const a = getData();
// Good
const userProfile = getUserProfile();
- Style: Consistent formatting (Prettier, ESLint, etc.).
- Comments: Explain “why” the code exists, not just “what” it does.
- Documentation: Updated and correct, especially for new APIs or modules.
3️⃣ Performance & Efficiency
Performance matters in every project.
Checklist:
- Algorithms: Use efficient algorithms and data structures.
// Bad - O(n^2)
arr.forEach(a => arr.forEach(b => { ... }));
// Good - O(n)
const set = new Set(arr);
- Scalability: Efficient with growing data size or user base.
- Bottlenecks: Avoid repeated computations or unnecessary operations.
- Reuse: Avoid code duplication; use shared functions/modules.
- Resources: Optimize CPU and memory usage.
- Caching: Reuse results to speed things up where appropriate.
- Compatibility: Works across supported browsers, devices, and platforms.
4️⃣ Security & Stability
Security should never be skipped.
Checklist:
- Validation: Sanitize and validate all inputs.
- Vulnerabilities: Guard against SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and similar.
- Data: Handle sensitive information (passwords, tokens, PII) securely.
- Error Handling: Fail gracefully with clear, logged errors.
try {
await processPayment();
} catch (err) {
logger.error(err);
throw new PaymentFailedError();
}
- Observability: Sufficient logging and monitoring in place.
- Compatibility: Works with older versions or required environments.
- API Design: Consistent, predictable, and easy to use.
- Dependencies: Use only safe and necessary libraries, updated to secure versions.
💬 Code Review Process Tips
Focus on Critical Issues First
Prioritize bugs, security risks, and performance issues before nitpicks.
Use a Constructive Tone
- Suggest improvements, don’t demand them.
- Use phrases like “What do you think about…?” or “Could we consider…?”
Be Specific
Link to documentation, examples, or patterns that support your feedback.
Follow Up
- After changes, verify all issues are resolved.
- Make sure no new issues have been introduced.
📋 Quick PR Review Checklist
A short version for quick checks in pull requests:
- Meets requirements without breaking existing features
- Clear and consistent naming, style, and documentation
- Efficient algorithms and resource usage
- Scalable and free of performance bottlenecks
- Secure input handling and data protection
- Proper error handling and observability in place
- PR is small, focused, and well-documented
Conclusion
A good code review isn’t a bug hunt competition.
It’s an opportunity for team learning, quality improvement, and building trust in the codebase.
Remember: Code reviews are about progress, not perfection.
– Ramin ✌️
As a senior software engineer with years of experience in large-scale systems, I reflect on the psychological, organizational, and cultural reasons why we often don’t do the right thing — even when we know what...